In March 2022, I was lucky enough to find a new population of Turk’s cap lilies (Lilium superbum) containing about 500 stems in two colonies in McCracken County while searching for spring ephemerals. Additional searches yielded five more colonies containing another 1,700 individuals, all within about 75 yards of each other.
Due to my unfamiliarity with this plant and the lack of blooms, it took a little research to verify they were Turk’s cap lilies and not their close relative, Michigan lily (L. michiganense). Dichotomous keys usually differentiate between these plants using flower characteristics i.e., tepal curvature and anther length, which is not very helpful if you don’t have a flower to examine. Several online sources mentioned two vegetative characteristics to check: L. superbum has smooth leaf margins (not finely serrate), and the bulbs are white (not yellow). The plants I found exhibited both of these features so I’m going with the Turks cap lily. This plant was found by Mr. Raymond Athey less than 10 miles from this site in 1978, so there is historical evidence supporting the L. superbum identification, as well.
That being said, some botanists are reluctant to rely on the vegetative characteristics described above and feel that positive identification requires examination of flower structures. After being moved to more suitable sites in the future, my hope is that some of these bulbs will produce flowers allowing their identity to be determined beyond any doubt.
The species name is pronounced “superb – um” as opposed to “super – bum” and refers to the flowers, which can be translated from Latin as proud, superb, excellent, splendid, or magnificent. Mr. Linnaeus did a good job naming this plant back in 1762!
Ecology
Turk’s cap lilies are classified as threatened in Kentucky by the Office of Kentucky Nature Preserves and probably occur in less than a dozen counties. They are scattered across the state from Black Mountain in Harlan County in the east to Carlisle County in the west. Threatened plants are defined by the OKNP as “… likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant part of its range in Kentucky.” So, the assumption is that their numbers are declining and will continue to do so in the future.
Counties where Lilium superbum occurs in the U.S.
The BONAP map (Biota of North America Project) to the right displays the counties where Lilium superbum occurs in the U.S. Light green counties have stable populations while those highlighted in yellow have populations that are small and possibly declining.
It is generally more common in upland areas along the Appalachian Mountain chain, which includes Black Mountain. So how did they end up in McCracken County and across the Ohio River in southern Illinois? Some botanists have theorized that many southern plant species migrated north and west following the Cumberland River and the Tennessee River, which join up with the Ohio River near Paducah. Perhaps the lilies travelled from the mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee along these waterways over the last several thousand years or so.
By Jonathan O. C. Kubesch*,**, Frank Reith*, Dillon P. Golding*,***, Jake Sanne*, Forrest Brown*, Derek Hilfiker*, Joseph D. House****, Jenna Beville*, and Peter Arnold*,*****
*Virginia Tech School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Blacksburg, VA
**Country Home Farms, Pembroke, VA
***Hoot Owl Hollow Farm, Woodlawn, VA
****Indiana National Guard, West Lafayette, IN
*****Arnold Classic Farms, Chestertown, MD
The public is familiar with red (Trifolium pratense) and white clover (Trifolium repens) growing throughout the Kentucky Commonwealth. However, North America, from Oregon to Florida, is home to a plethora of native clover species. Buffalo clover (Trifolium reflexum) is one of several clover species native to the eastern U.S.A. (Kubesch et al., 2022; Kubesch, 2020). This species demonstrates annual to short-lived perennial life histories, and has potential as a horticultural or agronomic crop (Quesenberry et al., 2003; Kubesch, 2020).
Current efforts to increase native clover populations involve laudable efforts regarding site management, as well as conservation horticulture (e.g Littlefield, 2022). After a site is prepared for planting, plugs are produced. Conservation horticulture work currently executes the following procedure:
Germinate seeds on filter paper in petri dishes (Figure 1)
Transfer seedlings to cell pack trays
Pot up plants into small pots (Figure 2)
Plug individuals into spaced nurseries or maintain on benches for seed production
Figure 1. Running buffalo clover (Trifolium stoloniferum) germinating on filter paper under laboratory conditions. Smyth Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA January 30, 2023.Figure 2. Running buffalo clover (Trifolium stoloniferum) growing in the greenhouse. University Greenhouses Bay 7A, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA February 3, 2023.
In restoration and agronomic contexts, seeding clover has a logistic and resource advantage over plugging clovers. Seeding clover can reduce the need for intensive planting efforts, reduce soil disturbance, and ease transportation of unique plant material. Seeding approaches require a basis for setting a seeding rate and dates. Often, clovers are timed for planting between Valentines’ Day and St. Patrick’s Day in the Upper South. Introduced red and white clovers are commonly frost seeded every several years into cool-season pastures (Kubesch et al., 2020).
Seeding clovers can also take advantage of physiological mechanisms that improve seed establishment. In the field, frost seeding involves defoliation of an existing grassland stand, broadcasting clover seed onto the stand, and letting freeze-thaw cycles incorporate the seed into the soil surface. Compared to many native and introduced grasses, clover seed coats allow the seed to survive freeze-thaw incorporation into the soil surface. Quesenberry et al (2003) reports that buffalo clover has a similar seed weight to introduced clovers. A common rate of pasture frost seeding is 4 lb/A red clover and 2 lb/A white clover (Kubesch et al., 2020).
Optimizing rather than maximizing seeding rate is desirable given the limited seed availability of buffalo clover as well as the desire to increase planting area in restoration attempts. Managers want to get a good stand with as little seed as necessary. In addition to generating stand densities that justify direct seeding over plugging, an optimal seeding rate should generate ground cover that conserves soil as well as meets existing criteria for composition.
The present experiment sought to determine whether a 2 lb/A or a 4lb/A seeding rate can optimize buffalo clover establishment relative to white and red clover. This objective was measured through emergence as well as cover assessments. The hypothesis of this study was that the higher seeding rate will achieve the aforementioned targets comparable to, or greater than, red clover and white clover.
Jake Sanne*, Dillon P. Golding**, Peter Arnold*, Jenna Beville*, Derek Hilfiker*, Forrest Brown*, and Jonathan O. C. Kubesch*, ***
*Virginia Tech School of Plant and Environmental Sciences
**Hoot Owl Hollow Farm, Woodlawn, VA
***Country Home Farms, Pembroke, VA
Introduction
Buffalo clover (Trifolium reflexum), is a rare native clover present in the eastern United States. In Kentucky, this species occurs in the vicinity of Mammoth Cave, as well as further west. Conservation efforts in the eastern United States have maintained many of these native populations, though there is interest in using horticulture and agriculture to increase buffalo clover populations (Quesenberry et al., 2003; Kubesch, 2020; Kubesch et al., 2022).
A limitation of these alternative approaches is the lack of data regarding the establishment of native clovers. For many rare plants, plugs are grown in nurseries and then planted to field sites (Littlefield, 2022). Even in the only published horticultural research, seed was grown into plugs for field plantings (Quesenberry et al., 2003). Buffalo clover has a fair degree of phenotypic variability in growth form, life history, and flower color across the geographic range. These differences in plant material might also suggest diversity in seed characteristics.
Seed weight is an important seed characteristic for increasing buffalo clover populations. Seed weights are associated with increased establishment success (Catano et al., 2022; Westoby, 1998). Published seed weights of red (Trifolium pratense), white (Trifolium repens), and buffalo clover come from a publication using buffalo clover accessions from the Coastal Plain (Quesenberry et al., 2003). Coastal Plain accessions appear to have annual life histories whereas Ohio River Valley accessions appear to be short-lived biennials or perennials (Kubesch, unpublished observations). The present study sought to map and determine seed weights for buffalo clover. The authors hypothesized that Coastal Plain accessions would have different seed weights than the Ohio River Valley accessions.
Materials and Methods
This study consisted of a mapping exercise, seed weight data collection, and then analysis. The mapping exercise discerned the positions of Coastal Plain and Ohio River Valley accessions using the geographic Fall Line as the demarcation between Coastal Plain and Ohio River Valley accessions. Accessions found on the corresponding side of the Fall Line were assigned to a Coastal Plain or Ohio River Valley. This mapping was conducted in ARCGIS software.
Seed weight data for a handful of accessions was accessible from the USDA GRIN system. Notably, these seed weight data overrepresented Coastal accessions rather than Ohio River Valley accessions. Additional data came from Quesenberry et al (2003) as well as manual measurements. Quesenberry et al (2003) selected accessions from TX, GA, MS, and FL. One accession in this study came from the Ohio River Valley. Seed from single plant selections of Cincinnati and Clarks River accessions were measured on a lab balance (Bonvoisin scale).
Data Analysis
Seed weight was treated as a completely randomized design. Initial analysis at the state-level was considered to address potential accession grouping at local scales. Differences in seed weight between accessions from the Coastal Plain and Ohio River Valley were also considered to test other known differences in accessions (e.g. annual or biennial life history). All analyses were conducted in SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). PROC GLIMMIX coded for a simple one-way ANOVA.
Jonathan O.C. Kubesch*, Kelly Winklelpleck*, Connor Doyle*, Lindsey Barbini*, John H. Fike*, and Michael Johnson**
*Virginia Tech School of Plant and Environmental Sciences
**Clarks River National Wildlife Refuge
Summary
Buffalo clover (Trifolium reflexum) is a true native clover of eastern U.S. provenance. Previous research suggests that buffalo clover has seed yields and weights similar to introduced clover species (making it suitable for increase). However, such research is limited, with little comparison of plant material from across the northern range of the species. In fact, there is overrepresentation of southern accessions from Georgia, Texas, Mississippi, and Florida. This overrepresentation stems from historical seed collections coming from Coastal Plain collections. In order to better represent accessions from the northern range of the species (both in current research and for future studies), this project sought to 1) conduct a comparison of buffalo clover accessions from across the range against red clover (T. pretense); and 2) bank seed from the Clarks River population for use in conservation and research. Plants were grown from seed to seed and studied in a common garden experiment with efforts taken to maintain genetic purity. Seed was then banked with the Southeastern Grasslands Initiative. Variability in phenotypes across the lifecycle were observed among northern and southern buffalo clover accessions, which suggests that the species complex has further structural variance. Southern accessions required less time to bloom and flowered without vernalization. Clarks River plant material has not yet flowered and appears to require vernalization.
Introduction
The native clovers of eastern North America are relics of the complex mosaic landscapes present prior to European settlement (Gillett and Taylor, 2001). Of these species, buffalo clover is an annual to biennial species with known morphological and reproductive variability (Vincent, 2001).
Kentucky clover (T. kentuckiense) is a recent addition to the flora (Chapel and Vincent, 2013). Species delimitation between Kentucky and buffalo clover has been determined using primarily floral characteristics; however, vegetative characters in a common garden experiment might further resolve the relationships within the species complex.
Previous work with Kentucky clover and running buffalo clover in greenhouse and field research suggest that these native species face fewer propagation challenges in comparison to other rare plants (Kubesch, 2018; Kubesch 2020). Historically, Dr. Norman Taylor at the University of Kentucky maintained all 3 clovers native to Kentucky in greenhouse collections (Kubesch, 2018; Daniel Boone, personal communication).
The objectives of this project were to collect seed from the northern edge of the buffalo clover range and compare buffalo to Kentucky clover. It was hypothesized that Kentucky clover would be more morphologically similar to buffalo clover accessions from Kentucky and Ohio than to accessions from the Coastal Plain.
The Lady Slipper newsletter of the Kentucky Native Plant Society has been published since the Society’s founding in 1986. We occasionally feature an article from a past issue. This one, about Kentucky’s most widespread milkweed species, Common Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca), first appeared in the fall of 2011, Vol. 26, No. 3. If you would like to see other past issues, visit the Lady Slipper Archives, where all issues from Vol. 1, No. 1, February 1986 to Vol. 34, No. 1, Winter/Spring 2019 (after which we moved to this blog format) can be found.
Kentucky’s Common Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) By David Taylor, US Forest Service
Whole plant with flowers
Common milkweed is a perennial forb that spreads by means of rhizomes and seed. It is one of about 115 species that occur in the Americas. Most species are tropical or arid land species. Plants may occur as a few individuals, but once established, form small to large colonies. Individual plants range from 1 to 2 m (~ 3 to 6 ft) tall. Leaves are elliptic to ovate to oblong and somewhat thick. Mature leaves are 15-20 cm (6-8 in) long and 5 to 9 cm (~ 2 to 3.6 in) wide, with a prominent midvein. The underside of the leaf is frequently finely pubescent. The stem is stout, usually simple, and green to black (see below) in color. When broken, the leaves, as well as stem and fruit, exude milky latex. Flowers are purplish to rosy pink to mostly white or even greenish and about 2 cm (0.75 in) long and 1 cm (0.4 in) wide. They occur in semi-spherical umbels (umbrella-like clusters) in the upper leaf axils. Flowers are somewhat complex in their structure, with structures not found in the average flower. The flowers are strongly and sweetly scented.
Milkweed pods
The fruits (pods), known as follicles, are formed from the union of multiple flowers. They are green, covered in soft spiky projections and are finely pubescent. When the seeds are mature, the follicle splits exposing the seeds. Each seed is equipped with a coma, a soft group of hairs. As the newly exposed seeds dry, the hairs of the coma expand allowing the seed to catch a ride on the wind. When broken, the leaves, as well as stem and fruit, exude milky latex.
Common milkweed is a widespread and somewhat weedy species. It is known from most of the eastern U.S and the eastern-most prairie states as well as southern Canada from New Brunswick to Saskatchewan. It is frequently found in fence rows, on roadsides, in fields, and in prairies and pastures. Given the opportunity, it will establish in gardens and even thin lawns. It is tolerant of light shade, but generally is a full sun species.
Monarch caterpillar on leaf
The genus name, Asclepias, commemorates Asklepios, the Greek god of medicine. Some of the species have a history of medicinal use including common milkweed (wart removal and lung diseases) and butterfly weed (aka pleurisy root— pleurisy and other lung disease). The specific epithet, syriaca, means ‘of Syria’ and is a misnomer: Linnaeus thought the species was native to Syria. This species is some times eaten as a salad herb, requiring multiple boilings of the young shoots before it is palatable. The reason for the boiling is to rid the shoots of various cardiac glucosides and other bitter principles. Milk weeds contain various levels of these compounds which render the plants toxic to most insects and animals. For some insects, the cardiac glucosides become a defense. They can store them in their tissue which renders them inedible or toxic to other animals. Monarch butterflies use this defense and birds leave them and the caterpillars alone. What the birds do not know is that northern monarchs feeding on common milkweed accumulate relatively little of the toxic compounds and probably would be edible. The more southern butterflies accumulate large amounts of the compounds from other species and are in fact toxic.
The stems contain a bast (inner ‘bark’) fiber used by Native Americans to produce twine and rope. The concentration and quality of the fiber make it potentially useful as a commercial fiber plant. Fiber quality is that of flax.
Common milkweed is an important pollinator and food plant for a large number of insects (more than 450 documented). It could be said that common milkweed is Nature’s mega food market for insects. Numerous butterflies, flies, bees, wasps, and beetles feed on the nectar and pollen produced by the flowers. Even hummingbirds will try, apparently unsuccessfully, to extract nectar. Aphids, especially the yellow-orange oleander or milkweed aphids (Aphis nerii), are commonly found on milkweeds including common milkweed. Large infestations of aphids can lead to formation of sooty mold on the plants which can turn the stems and leaves from green to gray to black. Two true bugs, the large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus) and the small milkweed bug (Lygaeus kalmia) feed on the seeds, but the large milkweed bug is more often encountered. Large populations of either species can reduce the seed production potential of a colony of common milkweed by as much as 80-90%. The colorful (red with black dots) red milkweed beetle (Tetraopes tetraophthalmus) feeds on the leaves. The milkweed leaf beetle (Labidomera clivicollis), another orange-red and black beetle may feed on common milkweed but has a preference for swamp milkweed (A. incarnata). At least two caterpillars, the milkweed tussock caterpillar (Euchaetes egle) and the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) feed on this plant. The red (or orange-red) and black coloration of most of these insects is known as aposematic coloration; that is, the colors advertise the fact that the organism is not good to eat. Other palatable species mimic the toxic species and gain some protection as a result. A well known example is the viceroy butterfly (Limenitis archippus) which mimics the monarch .
Large milkweed bugsPredated milkweed seedsMilkweed tussock moth caterpillarsMilkweed aphid, mothers and young, on Cynanchum laeve
For monarchs, common milkweed is among the most important food plants. It is the primary food plant for northern U.S. and southern Canada monarchs and is a major food plant for monarchs in the central and southern U.S. Monarchs migrating from the mountains of Mexico lay eggs on milkweed species in northern Mexico and the southern U.S. The butterflies that result from these eggs move further north in stages, with a change in species of milkweeds utilized as they move north. Common milkweed is the usual northern species. Monarchs can be helped by encouraging existing common patches of common milkweed and planting new ones. The plant grows readily from seed and spreads quickly by deep rhizomes. Because common milkweed can be weedy and difficult to remove, care should be used to establish the plant only in places where spread can be tolerated.
The Lady Slipper newsletter of the Kentucky Native Plant Society has been published since the Society’s founding in 1986. We occasionally feature an article from a past issue. This one, about the globally rare, and endangered, Short’s Goldenrod, Solidago shortii, first appeared in the summer of 1999, Vol. 14, No. 2 & 3. If you would like to see other past issues, visit the Lady Slipper Archives, where all issues from Vol. 1, No. 1, February 1986 to Vol. 34, No. 1, Winter/Spring 2019 (after which we moved to this blog format) can be found.
If you would like to see this rare and beautiful goldenrod, plan now to attend the KNPS Fall Meeting on Oct. 15.
A Short Take on Short’s Goldenrod
by James Beck
In Berkshire with the Wild Flowers / Elaine & Dora Read Goodale / 1879 / W. Hamilton Gibson, Illustrator
Anyone out for an afternoon walk or Sunday drive in Kentucky during late August through mid October just can’t miss the bright yellows in every field and fencerow that belong to the Goldenrods (Solidago sp.). Mary Wharton considered 32 different species in the Commonwealth. Two of them, the White Haired Goldenrod and Short’s Goldenrod, are endemic in Kentucky. They are known only from our state. [Editor’s note: at the time this article was written, Short’s goldenrod was only known from Kentucky. Since then a small population has been discovered across the Ohio in at least one county in Indiana.] The White Haired Goldenrod (Solidago albopilosa), discovered by E.L. Braun in the limestone clifflines of what is now Red River Gorge, is known from 90 populations and is listed as Federally Threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Short’s Goldenrod, (Solidago shortii), listed as Federally Endangered in 1985, is both a beautiful plant, and one with a fascinating history.
This species was first collected by the eminent Dr. C.W. Short (then chair of the Medical Department at the University of Louisville) on Rock Island, which lies at the famous “Falls of the Ohio” between Louisville and Clarksville, Indiana. This is one of several islands and stony outcrops which were dry for part of the year and completely submerged for the remainder, representing the only serious navigational impediment on the Ohio River from Pittsburgh to New Orleans. Sent east for identification, the Goldenrod found at the Falls was subsequently described as a new species by Drs. John Torrey and Asa Gray, then hard at work on the landmark Flora of North America.
Civil engineering projects, culminating with the opening of a hydroelectric dam in 1930, have been historically blamed for the apparent disappearance and extinction of Short’s Goldenrod by the 1870s. It wasn’t until 1939 that the only other known population was discovered by Lucy Braun on rocky slopes and grazed pastures near Blue Licks Battlefield State Park at the convergence of Robertson, Nicholas, and Fleming Counties, Kentucky. Today 13 small subpopulations survive, all within the vicinity of Blue Licks.
The disappearance of this species at the Falls of the Ohio (which may have actually occurred some years before construction of the dam at Louisville) and its decline over the years at Blue Licks have always raised questions. Evidence exists that might support a connection between historic bison usage and S. shortii. Bison were possibly a seed dispersal mechanism, or perhaps Short’s Goldenrod benefited from the reduced plant competition that resulted from their trampling. The Falls of the Ohio represents the most logical crossing point of the Ohio River on a trail which led the bison from the Midwest to the springs and salt licks of central Kentucky. Blue Licks itself is a famous lick, one which lies on a well documented horseshoe-shaped bison trace which began at what is now Covington and made a large circuit through the region, meeting the Ohio again at present day Maysville.
Solidago shortii from Britton & Brown’s Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions, 1913.
Short’s Goldenrod is easily identified in the field. Totally smooth, leathery leaves and the length of its involucre (the circle of bracts or leaflet-like structures surrounding each flower) separate it out from most of the other local Goldenrod species. The Riverbank Goldenrod, (Solidago rupestris) is the most similar in form, although simple habitat differences (riverbanks versus dry, glady conditions) should end any confusion. Three other Goldenrods, S. altissima, S. ulmifolia, and S. nemoralis, grow with S. shortii at Blue Licks, but sufficient morphological differences exist between them and Short’s, and anyone with a little patience and basic knowledge of terminology should have little trouble finding it.
Short’s Goldenrod is not included in Wharton and Barbour’s Kentucky wildflower guide. The best key to it is the key to Solidago in Gleason and Cronquist’s Manual of the Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada.
The easiest viewing of this rare species occurs in the Kentucky State Nature Preserve Commission’s Buffalo Trace Preserve, which is in the vicinity of Blue Licks Battlefield State Park. A truly unique and enjoyable day trip for any Kentuckian would be traveling from Lexington though Paris and on to the Park, all on US Highway 68. In just a few hours one could enjoy the majesty of the Bluegrass horse farms and the beauty of probably the rarest variety of our state flower.
The Lady Slipper newsletter of the Kentucky Native Plant Society has been published since the Society’s founding in 1986. We occasionally feature an article from a past issue. This one, about a rare, and threatened, native vine, Clematis crispa, commonly known as Blue Jasmine or Swamp Leather-Flower, first appeared in the summer of 2013, Vol. 28, No. 2. If you would like to see other past issues, visit the Lady Slipper Archives, where all issues from Vol. 1, No. 1, February 1986 to Vol. 34, No. 1, Winter/Spring 2019 (after which we moved to this blog format) can be found.
One of the plants I look for every spring in western Kentucky is Clematis crispa, commonly known as Blue Jasmine or Swamp Leather-Flower. C. crispa is listed as “Threatened” by the Office of Kentucky Nature Preserves and is only known from the four western counties along the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers – Ballard, Carlisle, Hickman and Fulton. It occurs in a few counties across the rivers in southern Illinois and western Missouri and becomes more common as you head into the southern states.
As its name implies, this native clematis likes to grow in wetlands, floodplains and swamps. All of the sites where I’ve found this plant growing in Ballard and Carlisle counties are flooded for some portion of the year when the rivers decide to overflow their banks. In addition to enjoying getting its feet wet, C. crispa prefers a bright location and is usually found competing for sunlight along with all the other vine species that like to grow in swampy conditions. The stems of this herbaceous vine grow to a length of 6- 10 feet and the plants die back to ground level each winter. The flowers consist of four sepals (no petals) that curl backwards resulting in an urn-like appearance.
Finding this plant in the field is a matter of being in the right place at the right time. Searching for the purple-blue flowers before the neighboring vines have put out all of their foliage affords the best chance for success. Another option that requires good eyesight is to search for the distinctive seed pods, sometimes referred to as “Devil’s Darning Needles” in the fall.
Two additional native clematis species that can be found in western Kentucky include C. pitcheri (Bluebill) and C. virginiana (Virgin’s Bower). Differentiating C. crispa from C. pitcheri is best accomplished by examining the undersides of the leaves. C. pitcheri exhibits a prominent raised network of veins which are absent on C. crispa.
A quick internet search turned up several native plant nurseries where Swamp Leather- Flower can be purchased. From the planting advice given on these sites it apparently does well when grown in containers and I’m guessing it would make a nice addition to an outdoor pond or water garden
